A Fresh Look at Google's Webmaster Guidelines
Taken a look at Google's Webmaster Guidelines lately? If not, you should.
Seems that the team at Google have been quietly editing the guidelines pages since I last popped my head in about a few months ago. Thanks to the Internet Archive, I can bring to your attention some additions made to the Webmaster Guidelines in the past year:
Seems that the team at Google have been quietly editing the guidelines pages since I last popped my head in about a few months ago. Thanks to the Internet Archive, I can bring to your attention some additions made to the Webmaster Guidelines in the past year:
This is a biggie. Explains why sites with URLs that include session id's have such trouble getting listed in Google! A very convincing reason to integrate a parameter workaround if your site uses dynamically generated pages, whether they include session id's or not.
Don't use "&id=" as a parameter in your URLs, as we don't include these pages in our index.
This one was obviously added after the launch of Sitemaps and is good advice for any webmaster serious about getting all their pages indexed by Googlebot.
Submit a sitemap as part of our Google Sitemaps (Beta) project. Google Sitemaps uses your sitemap to learn about the structure of your site and to increase our coverage of your webpages.
Submit your site to relevant directories such as the Open Directory Project and Yahoo!, as well as to other industry-specific expert sites.Note the words in bold have been added to this sentence sometime in the past year. Nothing to write home about here except perhaps an inkling that the ODP is not as important as it used to be.
Make pages for users, not for search engines. Don't deceive your users or present different content to search engines than you display to users, which is commonly referred to as "cloaking."Again, the words in bold have been added since last year. Looks like an attempt by Google to reinforce their firm stance against cloaking. Also provides their personal definition of what cloaking is, a topic that has seen great debate in the search engine industry over the past 12 months.







3 Comments:
Thanks for saving me time and helping folks stay up to date!
This is a treat post on recent guideline changes; great to see a shift away from the DMOZ (if that is what it is) in my opinion.
- Michael
Very interesting additions. Especially the &id=. We have been noticing that almost all pages that had &id= are now gone from the index. There are still some, for example when you search for &id= in google you get the page below as the second result...
http://www.allmambo.com/index.php?o...&id=13&Itemid=2
But when you type in allinurl:&id= you get 0 results.
It is clear that they do not want to have to deal with websites that could potentially have thousands of session id urls in their index.
Thanks for the great info :)
--Steve
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Post a Comment
<< Home